These 24 hour train indicator dials are apparently still to be found in the entrance lobby of the headquarters of the London Underground, at 55 Broadway. They featured in David Heathcote’s TV program looking at London’s 1920s Art Deco heritage, shown recently on on BBC 4.
There’s a separate indicator for each of six main lines running when the building was first opened. It’s possible that one of them is still running today.
Each dial starts at 0600 and runs until 0100, passing through 2400 on the way, and appear to rotate clockwise, past an indicator at the bottom. How they actually indicate the trains is not clear —if anyone knows, please tell us!
Such a modern look wouldn’t be surprising, of course, since Frank Pick had just become managing director of what is now called London Underground. Frank Pick’s preference for the 24 hour time system can be seen in this letter to the London Times, on May 4, 1931:
￼UNDERGROUND PREPARED FOR ACCEPTANCE
TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES
Sir,– I note that on Wednesday next Lord Newton is to move in the House of Lords for the adoption of the 24-hour clock recommended by the Home Office Committee as far back as 1919.
To the general inconvenience, we still proceed to reckon time, not by days, but by half-days. This is, perhaps, forced upon our attention most in railway time- tables, for railways run continuously round and round the clock, and in international broadcasting programmes where all times of the day become one time.
The Underground day, although it has defined limits, is odd, starting about 5 a.m. and closing about 1 a.m., some 20 hours later. Numerous devices of type and symbol are employed for distinguishing anti- and post-meridional time, but they are often uncertain and sometimes clumsy. It would therefore be a gain if the convention of the 24-hour clock, covering the entire day, were commonly adopted so that 2.30 a.m. would be plain 2.30 and 2.30 p.m. would become 14.30.
On the Underground Railways we should be prepared to make the ￼change. Certainly the transit of the sun across the meridian has no visible significance underground.
For one, however, to change is only a gesture, and has its awkward reactions. If all who use time for time-tables were to change, then we should have rationalized one further detail of living.
55, Broadway, Westminster, S.W.1
and again on 7 December 1933:
￼Sir,–I note the Astronomer Royal’s letter in The Times of December 2.
As it happens, the London Passenger Transport Board has to consider the reprinting of its time-tables for its railway and coach services, and the problem of distinguishing between a.m. and p.m. once more arises. It seems strange that there should be any reluctance to adopt a proposal which has been found necessary in all those spheres of activity in which exactitude is essential.
That there is a need for a solution of the problem must be apparent to anyone who studies time-tables. For it will be found that all kinds of typographical devices are used in an attempt to avoid any confusion between a.m. times and p.m. times.￼
I therefore once more urge that we should now adopt a common practice in this matter. Once it is adopted and made a common practice,no more, I am sure, will be heard in criticism of it.
55, Broadway, Westminster, S.W. 1
More details of how Britain tried and failed to adopt the 24 hour clock can be found in the ebook: Counting Time.